Enduring 80 years since the atomic bombing of Hiroshima: navigating the nuclear era

Enduring 80 years since the atomic bombing of Hiroshima: navigating the nuclear era

In a world where the spectre of nuclear war looms larger than ever, the current state of global nuclear disarmament efforts presents significant challenges and a deteriorating landscape. This is marked by stalled treaties, rising nuclear modernization, and heightened threats.

The destructive power of the world's nuclear arsenals is many times greater than the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. History has proven that nuclear weapons can be used, with the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulting in the death of approximately 80,000 and tens of thousands more residents respectively. The long-term effects led to the death of hundreds of thousands more.

The threat of nuclear strikes is not confined to the past. Russian politicians have repeatedly threatened nuclear strikes in the dispute over the Ukraine war. Israel, a nuclear power, has bombed Iranian nuclear facilities allegedly used for weapons production. Even Japan, which suffered hundreds of thousands of deaths, injuries, and illnesses from the atomic bombings, is moving away from its pacifist principles and rearming.

Key treaties such as the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) have failed to gain adoption by nuclear-weapon states. Instead, they prioritize the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) regime, which has succeeded in limiting proliferation but has been criticized for lacking effective nuclear disarmament actions by nuclear powers.

Recent developments reveal extensive nuclear modernization programs and rising expenditure on nuclear weapons globally. The United States alone is spending 56% of $91.4 billion in 2023 and planning $1.5 trillion over the next 30 years for modernization. This modernization includes improving lethality and efficiency despite a long history of nuclear accidents and warnings about nuclear war risks.

The 2010 New START treaty between the U.S. and Russia, the last major strategic arms limitation treaty, is set to expire in February 2026 without agreed extensions, potentially accelerating an unconstrained nuclear arms race. Multiple arms control treaties have been abrogated without replacements, reducing global arms control stability.

In response, the United Nations General Assembly has established a 21-member independent scientific panel to conduct a comprehensive study of nuclear war effects, underscoring the urgency of addressing this existential threat. However, opposition by nuclear powers such as France, the UK, and Russia presents a significant obstacle.

In the United States, attempts to renew global leadership in halting the arms race face political and financial obstacles. While some executive interest in nuclear spending reduction exists, initiatives like “Project 2025” encourage nuclear modernization. Congressional resolutions highlight the concern over treaty expirations and the need to halt the nuclear arms race, but funding for disarmament efforts has dropped, and anti-nuclear advocacy faces declining support.

As the world grapples with the challenges of nuclear disarmament, it is crucial to remember the words of 93-year-old peace activist Terumi Tanaka, who survived the atomic inferno: "Every bomb is a security risk because it can ultimately be used." The international community must strive to reduce this risk and work towards a world free of nuclear weapons.

References: 1. Arms Control Association. (2021). Nuclear Weapons Modernization and Disarmament: A Primer. Retrieved from https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/NuclearWeaponsModernization 2. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. (2022). Doomsday Clock. Retrieved from https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/ 3. International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. (2022). Nuclear Weapons: The Humanitarian Impact. Retrieved from https://www.icanw.org/the-humanitarian-impact/ 4. National Security Archive. (2021). The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Truman's Decision. Retrieved from https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb381/ 5. Ploughshares Fund. (2021). Nuclear Modernization and Disarmament. Retrieved from https://ploughshares.org/issues/nuclear-modernization-disarmament/

1. The devastating power of nuclear weapons, with consequences far greater than those seen in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, highlights the importance of continued scientific research and understanding of medical-conditions related to these catastrophic events.
2. Despite the dire financial implications, the escalating nuclear modernization programs in space-and-astronomy, technology, and education-and-self-development sectors demonstrate a troubling disregard for general-news of global nuclear disarmament efforts.
3. In sports competitions, perhaps athletes could champion the cause of nuclear disarmament, using their platforms to educate and rally public support for a world free of nuclear weapons.
4. As the weather patterns continue to change and become unpredictable, the potential environmental consequences of a nuclear war should serve as a wake-up call for renewed efforts in nuclear disarmament and global finance for peace initiatives.
5. The Threat of nuclear strikes is not limited to geopolitical conflicts; the spectre of their use in space-and-astronomy exploration and technology advancements is a looming concern that demands urgent attention and self-development in diplomatic and disarmament strategies.

Read also: