Assessing Usability: Guide to Performing a Heuristic Evaluation

Assessing Usability: Guide to Performing a Heuristic Evaluation

Heuristic evaluation is a valuable tool in the world of user interface design, providing a systematic method for assessing the usability of a product. This process, which typically takes around two hours, involves two phases and is based on assumptions about what constitutes good usability.

To conduct a heuristic evaluation, a list of appropriate heuristics is established, evaluators with usability expertise and domain knowledge are selected, briefed, and tasked with evaluating the product. They record any problems they encounter, and a debriefing session is held to collate findings and suggest solutions.

The heuristics proposed by Jakob Nielsen and Rolf Molich in the 1990s serve as foundational guidelines in this process. These ten heuristics are designed to improve usability by aligning interfaces with well-established human factors principles.

1. Visibility of system status: The system should always keep users informed about what is going on through appropriate feedback within a reasonable time.
2. Match between system and the real world: The system should speak the users’ language with words, phrases, and concepts familiar to the user, following real-world conventions.
3. User control and freedom: Users should have clear options to correct mistakes and navigate away from unwanted states without unnecessary hassle.
4. Consistency and standards: Users should not have to wonder whether different words, situations, or actions mean the same thing.
5. Error prevention: Design should prevent problems from occurring in the first place rather than just providing good error messages.
6. Recognition rather than recall: Minimize the user’s memory load by making objects, actions, and options visible.
7. Flexibility and efficiency of use: The system should cater to both inexperienced and experienced users, with accelerators for the latter to speed up interactions.
8. Aesthetic and minimalist design: Dialogues should not contain information which is irrelevant or rarely needed, to reduce user distractions.
9. Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors: Error messages should be expressed in plain language, precisely indicate the problem, and constructively suggest a solution.
10. Help and documentation: While ideally the system can be used without documentation, it may be necessary to provide help and documentation that is easy to search, focused on the user’s task, and concise.

Heuristic evaluation is a cost-effective, iterative improvement method, allowing for the identification and resolution of usability issues early in the design process. For example, Visibility of system status can be addressed by including progress indicators or feedback messages, User control and freedom can be implemented by adding undo/redo options or escape routes, and Aesthetic and minimalist design guides designers to remove unnecessary content.

While heuristic evaluation is a powerful tool, it's essential to remember that it is not the only method that should be relied upon. Enrico Bertini, Silvia Gabrielli, and Stephen Kimani have adapted heuristics for mobile devices, and as technology evolves, these guidelines must be adapted to new technologies such as voice-based smart devices.

It's also important to note that 43% of 'problems' identified by experimental heuristic evaluations were not actual problems. Therefore, it's crucial to conduct user research and test designs with real users to continually refine your work.

Jakob Nielsen suggests that between three and five evaluators is sufficient for a heuristic evaluation. The more evaluators you have, the more usability issues you will unearth. However, heuristic evaluation can end up giving false alarms, so it's important to approach this method with a critical eye and a willingness to verify findings through user testing.

In conclusion, heuristic evaluation plays a significant role in the design and evaluation phases of user interface design, helping to improve usability by aligning interfaces with well-established human factors principles. However, it should be used in conjunction with other methods, and findings should always be verified through user testing.

1. The use of heuristic evaluation in UX design incorporates the principle of visibility of system status, which promotes the inclusion of progress indicators or feedback messages to keep users aware of the system's current status.
2. To enhance user control and freedom in UI design, designers could implement undo/redo options or create escape routes, which allow users to rectify mistakes or navigate away from unwanted states with minimal effort.
3. As a part of the aesthetic and minimalist design approach, designers should strive to remove irrelevant or seldom-required content from dialogues to minimize user distractions and elevate the overall user experience.
4. To leverage the benefits of data-and-cloud-computing in heuristic evaluation, evaluators may need to adapt heuristics for new technologies like voice-based smart devices, ensuring that they align with emerging human-computer interaction patterns.
5. Combining heuristic evaluation with other methods such as user research, user testing, and interaction design (alongside information architecture and education-and-self-development resources for personal growth) enhances the accuracy and efficacy of identifying and resolving usability issues in the design process.

Read also: